Adam Smith and David Ricardo tried to explain the distribution of wealth using almost the same starting points, only that Ricardo was based theories of Malthus .
Karl Marx who, very indirectly, teach us broke ass all with their analysis of economic history was not only a gifted foreseeing the destruction of capitalism. .. but a motherfucker Reverend got a thousand and one theories (including that of''Value-Work ''and the'' Econtheses criticizing the price formation process of the medical service market in which nearly cost him his doctorate, concluded that an alternative was to free the housing market to correct the inequalities of income, created a doctrine called ''monetarist''
basic theories and rejected the Keynesian model. After a month dedicated to the study, that's all I could salvage. Will not be long and during the end have to '''' guitar a little, but if there is a God in heaven and the devil is in hell only they know how much I hate to study the theoreticalMacroeconomics rich. Yet I can not but be surprised by this little summary, although ironically enough, rescues the most important of those who laid the foundation of economic ideas. At the end read them with their fights and insults disguised, it's almost like watching gossip program in the afternoon.
I just hope that everything remains as clear morning and pause to write my new ZADR not charged my attention.
0 comments:
Post a Comment